It is well known that firms with inadequate systems for managing risk are liable to suffer serious breakdowns that interrupt operations and cost the companies dearly in terms of fines, remediation efforts, and damage to their reputations. But firms’ risk management systems are only as good as the data fed into them. What of firms that pay attention to the wrong metrics, employ error-prone data-collection practices, or rely on otherwise misleading data to manage their risks?
Better Risk Data: Regulatory Mandate and Strategic Opportunity, an article written by Promontory Financial Group’s Ray Strecker, Yoko Otani, and Stacy Coleman, focuses on U.S. and global banking regulators’ increasing expectation that financial firms bolster their risk management by improving how they collect, manage, and assess data. But these best data practices for the financial sector are broadly applicable to firms, in every industry, that need to negotiate complex risks. This article demonstrates that firms should incorporate forward-looking, data-driven risk assessments into their routines of doing business.
Bank regulators like the Financial Stability Oversight Council, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Federal Reserve Board, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have suggested that financial firms need to improve how they aggregate and report risk data. Many of these banks are attempting to meet the regulators’ requirements by building a series of one-off processes and systems. That approach can lead to a patchwork of partial capabilities that may leave firms farther adrift from the goal of having the authoritative, consistent information they need.
This article explains why financial and other institutions should aim for a comprehensive approach to managing risk information. Well-designed systems for gathering and assessing risk data will satisfy and surpass regulatory requirements.
Firms that manage their risk information well also enjoy a significant strategic advantage over their peers. These data-savvy firms can expand into new markets and develop new products with a clear-eyed view of the pitfalls — economic, operational, or regulatory — that may await them.
Sound aggregation and use of high-quality data will also go a long way toward meeting the expectations of boards of directors, investors, and customers — along with the media and broader public, which in recent years have given their close attention to high-profile breakdowns in risk-data management that have caused firms significant distress.
See the full article: Better Risk Data: Regulatory Mandate and Strategic Opportunity at this link.
About the Authors
Ray Strecker is a managing director at Promontory Financial Group and specializes in advising clients on large-scale program design and management at the intersection of regulation, risk, and technology. He has a broad background in consulting and information technology for financial institutions and other firms.
Yoko Otani is a managing director at Promontory Financial Group and advises clients on risk and compliance matters, including asset-liability and liquidity risk management, and helps integrate strategic and regulatory objectives.
Stacy Coleman is a senior director at Promontory Financial Group and assists clients with regulatory and supervisory issues and the effective aggregation and reporting of risk data.