Category Archives: Do & Review

Take action. Review what happens.

Level Titles

It is a good practice to separate level titles from job functions. This independence allows general criteria to be applied as it makes sense to a given the job function and in a way that transcends job functions so that we can assign someone to a new role without having to rethink the level-title.

The criteria below are generally applicable and have been developed and proven useful over decades of application. Note that the level descriptions stay clear of definitions tied to functions performed and number of people managed in favor of how a person performs and the outputs produced.

Level-1: Demonstrates a high degree of proficiency in some area of great importance to the business. Has applied the proficiency with a high degree of independence and over a sustained period (generally two to three years) and is a recognized expert in the area. Continue reading Level Titles

How to reduce risks on important projects.

Background on Managing Risk on Important Projects

Reduce Risk on Important ProjectsIn the context of any strategic initiative involving a significant evolution in systems, process, or organization, risk is the chance that the effort will be less than a complete success … that it will be late, over budget, perform unacceptably when completed, fail to realize the expected business benefits, or even never be completed.

There are so many factors that can contribute to a less-than-successful project.  How is a project manager to decide which to focus on and how to address them?

Approach

Milt Hess, in his paper Reducing Risk on Projects, presents a strategy for deciding which risk factors deserve attention and for integrating risk reduction into the project holistically instead of treating it as a separate activity.  This strategy turns the traditional approach to risk management on its head.  Instead of thinking about all the things that can wrong, it focuses on what has to go right.

The strategy requires that a project first establish a clear definition of success – its success targets.  The paper describes concrete steps that the project can take to increase the likelihood of meeting the targets and the questions that senior management and sponsors should ask to ensure that the project stays on track.

Here are a few of the key elements of the approach:

  • Periodically develop a forecast of the expected outcomes for the success targets. If the forecast for a target is ‘I don’t know’, the project is at risk.  Include resources in the project plan to reduce uncertainty about the outcome.
  • Dependency on external events and agents introduces risk. Explicitly identify dependencies during the planning process, document assumptions, and monitor them regularly.  Include resources in the project plan to reduce uncertainty about the dependencies.

Continue reading How to reduce risks on important projects.

How to get back on track when a project goes awry.

Storyboard blocks_v5_finalWhen a project goes awry  and no longer performing according to plan:

  • Assign a single capable person to serve as Project Manager (PM) responsible for the entire project through to completion if one is not already assigned or if the one assigned has proven ineffective.  The PM should be someone who has previously been successful in similar circumstances in terms of project scope, scale, and complexity.  If someone with requisite experience is not available to serve as PM then arrange for the experienced person to serve as a close adviser to the PM until a new plan is in place and performance relative to the new plan is on track.
  • Have the PM work with the client, the project team, management, and advisers to pull together a revised plan. Review the plan thoroughly with the PM, the project team, and with outside stakeholders, including the client, to be sure the path to completion, all the way through to client acceptance, is well formulated, understood, agreed to, and sensible.

Continue reading How to get back on track when a project goes awry.

Bi-weekly One-on-One Executive Meetings

Leaders whose direct reports submit regular (e.g., monthly) status reports on progress, problems, and plans should consider re-working their approach to include more frequent (e.g., bi-weekly), one-on-one, real-time meetings to discuss progress and to collaborate and align on how things are going, priorities, and next steps.

Specifically, top leaders ask each direct report to prepare and submit a day or so ahead of meeting one-on-one:

  • An update on progress since last meeting, including a read-out of measures previously agreed upon to track progress.
  • A list of the top one, two, or at most three things they are working on, and for each:
    • What they seek to accomplish
    • What has been done so far to accomplish it
    • What has happened as a result of what has been done so far
    • What has been learned from above
    • What they plan to do  next.
  • What they need from their leader and / or from others in the organization to be successful.

Note:

  • Prepared materials are submitted ahead so that they are well thought-out and not just what comes to mind while meeting. Failure to prepare and submit ahead of the meeting generally leads to the time in the meeting being used to prepare what should have been submitted leaving little or no time to thoughtfully process what has been prepared.
  • Performance measurements are published and reviewed ahead of meeting so that meeting time is not spent revealing and absorbing new data that is best taken-in, absorbed, and reflected upon to reach a point-of-view ahead of time.

There will be variability in level of detail (too high-level or too detailed) across direct reports. The leader iterates with each to get them to the right level based on experience, training, ability, situation, and resources all relative to their assignment. It is not critical to get each to be like the others though patterns, standards, and best practices will likely emerge over time.

The one-on-one process as described invariably improves performance because most people are so busy doing their jobs that they do not have time to get clear about what is most important even though being clear about what is most important correlates highly with success (as explained so well in the first of Stephen Covey’s Seven Habits for Success: First things First).

One-on-Ones are a structured, systematic way for a leader to do the one thing that is most likely to lead to the best performance: get themselves and their direct reports absolutely clear about what is at the top of each to-do list.

Keep in mind

It is harder than it seems for a leader, let alone direct reports, to determine what is most important to do next. When they collaborate on the to-do list, leader and direct report form a team of two working together to apply their relative strengths to accomplish the same thing, in the same way, for the same reason, and for mutual success; all of which leads to improved clarity, alignment, better choices, and, most likely, also to better results.

Starting the one-on-one with what has happened on what was agreed upon last time instills accountability and increases the odds that what was agreed will indeed be acted upon. Use the Meeting Record template to memorialize each session and to set up for the next. Agreeing on what measure to watch increases focus, accountability, and the odds of success. Collaborating to find the right measures to watch clarifies what the person is to accomplish and ensures everyone is on the same page. Remember: You can’t manage what you don’t measure!

Requiring direct reports to think through, organize for discussion, and turn-in prepared summaries ahead of meeting requires them to step-back, reflect, and consolidate what is going on as opposed to coming up with something of the fly. The result is less time in the one-on-one figuring out what is going on and more time working towards results.

Leaders that stay present and in a collaborative mindset (without taking over) create the opportunity to clarify, do, track, and report on what is to be done, ask good questions that lead to breakthroughs, giving advice and artifacts that increase the odds of better results, sooner.

Put These Ideas Into Practice

In the Manage to Lead (MtL) program, you don’t just study tools like one-on-one meetings — you apply them directly to your own organization. YOUR CASE IS THE COURSE. By working hands-on with proven frameworks, you and your team surface hidden assumptions, sharpen execution, and accelerate performance. Learn more about the MtL program here »

How to think about and organize Project, Client, and Offering Managers.

Clients and Offerings
Figure 1: A business with project that deliver offerings to clients.
Projects
Figure 2: Project managers deliver offering value on time, on target, and on budget.

Organizations that offer solutions to clients manage: Projects, Clients, and Offerings as suggested in Figure 1. Managing each requires different skills and seeks to achieve different goals as outlined below.

Project Managers, see Figure 2, deliver offering value to specific clients on time, on budget, and on target. Project Managers are also counted on to extend and expand engagements in order to deliver even greater value over a longer time frame. Continue reading How to think about and organize Project, Client, and Offering Managers.